1. Marriage definition:
Preamble: In order to amend the Federal Constitution, seven provinces representing at least 50% of the population of Canada must support the amendment;
Question: Will you as premier propose a motion to hold a vote within the Legislative Assembly to amend the constitution to redefine marriage as being between a man and a woman?
Hancock: No. The fight on this one is at the federal level. That’s where the discussion should be focussed.


2. Protection of freedoms legislation:
Preamble:  A Calgary pharmacist lost her job because she felt it was wrong for her to fill prescriptions for drugs that cause abortion. Nurses have been threatened with loss of their jobs, and indeed some have, because they refused to assist with abortions. Educators face the same predicaments if they refuse to teach sex education courses. A teacher in B.C. was fired because he wrote a letter to the editor regarding same-sex marriage. And the list goes on. Given that, in these cases, courts and/or human rights tribunals have repeatedly denied or struck down these fundamental freedoms guaranteed by the Canadian Charter;
Question 1: Will you as Premier introduce or support legislation that protects all Albertans when they exercise their Charter section 2 rights and freedoms of speech, conscience, religion and assembly?
Hancock: Legislation isn't needed. The government needs to take a look at areas where there may have been a misuse of existing legislation. We need to be strategic in what is done to protect rights.

Question 2: Will a government under your leadership be willing to disband or curtail the power of the Provincial Human Rights commission?
Hancock: No. The Human Rights Commissions are a necessary body. The issue is examining whether or not they are doing their job properly. Once chosen, HRC members are not accountable, so the manner in which they are chosen is therefore important. There probably should be a more public process in place for appointment to the HRC. Perhaps it is time to have a discussion about the role and function of the HRC, who it is and how it operates.


3. Notwithstanding clause:
Preamble:  Premiers Lougheed, Blakeney and Lyon successfully negotiated for the inclusion of the Nothwithstanding Clause in Canada’s constitution in 1981. Said Premier Lougheed: "The reason we took that decision is we believed that when it comes down to it, there must be supremacy of the elected people over the supremacy of nine appointed judges." (Quoted by Licia Corbella, Calgary Sun, Wed. Jan. 11, 2006, “Martin Shocks Drafter of Charter of Rights.”)
Question:  Under what circumstances would a government under your leadership be willing to invoke the Notwithstanding clause?
Hancock: A hard question to answer in a generic sense. Hancock agrees entirely with Mr. Lougheed – parliament has to be supreme. Hancock was one of a few people around at the time speaking against the Charter of Rights. Now there is the supremacy of the courts over parliament because it is almost impossible to change the Charter. Hancock would invoke the Notwithstanding Clause when he feels the courts have ruled differently than what the people of the province expect. If invoked, it should be subject to approval by the electorate via referendum at the next election.


4. Citizen’s initiative legislation:
Preamble:  In many political jurisdictions, citizens are empowered to initiate legislation through means such as a petition that, if successful, would result in a binding vote on specific issues such as tax increases or gun control;
Question:  Will a government under your leadership sponsor or endorse legislation that allows for citizen-generated initiatives?
Hancock: No. People are elected to reflect the will of the citizens.


5. Education:
Preamble:  Nations from around the world have come to observe and desire to emulate Alberta’s education system for a number of reasons, including the concept of respecting parental input in the process of developing programs of choice within the system as evidenced in the large variety of school programs such as the public, separate, independent, charter and home-school options available here;
Question: Will a government under your leadership continue to support parents in their educational choices for their children?
Hancock: Absolutely. Making sure that every child has the opportunity to succeed is important and people have to have appropriate educational choices for that to happen.


6. Health funding:
Preamble:  In 2005, a national poll showed that 80% of Albertans surveyed do not support taxpayer funding of all abortions. The Canada Health Act does not specify the medical services for which provinces must pay. Albertans paid for over 10,000 abortions in 2004;
Question: Do you support removing all abortion services from Alberta Health Care’s list of insured services?
Hancock: No. By de-listing abortion for non-medical purposes, a decision would have to made to define what is medically necessary.


7. Gambling:
Preamble:  On July 1, 2000, Video Lottery Terminals were declared illegal and removed in South Carolina after state legislators reviewed multiple studies relating to the costs and complications involved with problem gambling. Other jurisdictions around the world have curtailed various types of gambling activity as a result of serious efforts to determine the social costs related to gambling;
Question:  Will a government under your leadership be willing to undertake a meaningful review of the latest studies related to problem gambling and take appropriate measures to restrict or eliminate harmful gambling activities as other jurisdictions have done?
Hancock: Absolutely. Hancock is not a fan of gambling, but personal views would not be imposed on others.


8. Euthanasia:
Preamble:  As a result of laws passed in specific European nations, there has been an increased call for “right-to-die” legislation by some in this country;
Question:  What will a government under your leadership do if the Federal Government adopts “right-to-die” legislation and suggests it has to be implemented nation-wide?
Hancock: Stated that he doesn’t know how to answer that question because he doesn’t know what that would involve. Hancock is not personally in favor of assisted suicide but doesn’t think he has the right to choose for others.


9. Provincial incentives for families:
Preamble:  Governments in various jurisdictions have implemented policies designed to foster a family-friendly culture that ultimately benefits society and can help to increase the dangerously-low birth rate we are experiencing in this province and nation. Government initiatives have included financial bonuses for having more than one child, increased funding available for child-care or education to be used at the parents' discretion, the elimination of health-care premiums, and the implementation of a more favourable tax status for families;
Question:  Will a government under your leadership implement policies designed to reduce the financial burden for a stay-at-home parent household and to promote a family-friendly culture in this province?
Hancock: Government rules should enhance the ability for families to make choices. It is not for the community to take care of the family unless the family needs assistance from outside. At a very minimum, government has to make sure it is not negative towards family.